About

Presentation

The Center for Studies on Ancient Diversity: Prehistory, Antiquity, and the Middle Ages brings together historians, philosophers, literary scholars, philologists, linguists, social anthropologists, and archaeologists at the Institute of Philosophy and Human Sciences of Unicamp. From a critical standpoint regarding hegemonic processes representation, it aims to contemplate Ancient societies in light of their diversity, critically addressing both homogenizing reconstructions and those that approach diverse historical experiences through inflexible and exogenous parameters. To do so, it reconsiders spatial frameworks and human interactions within the space and time of societies that have had or still have a controversial relationship with modernity.

The comparative, interdisciplinary, synchronous, and diachronic investigation carried out at CEDA aims to contribute to the participation of the past in critical reflection on possible futures from a planetary, inclusive, and supportive perspective.

The Place of Remote Past

The modern movement, in establishing itself within historical time, presented itself as the endpoint of a new teleology, projecting itself into both time (as the past of the future) and space (as the future of all experiences). It’s not surprising, therefore, that major political challenges of recent modernity involve the perception of time and control over the definition of events and facts. Today, as modernity confronts its controversial limits—between self-destructive growth and its overcoming—revisiting the distant or near past becomes essential for critical reflection on the contents of social memory and the redefinition of the place of the past and the imperatives operating in its rescue and recording.
It’s common for the study of the remote past to be called into question. This demand, which does not weigh on the knowledge of history, philosophy, language, and literature from other periods, says something important about the status of time in hegemonic culture. The study of ancient societies is respected for the erudition it accumulates and the tradition it legitimizes—especially when we speak of classical antiquity—particularly on important topics such as freedom, individuality, and democracy. Despite this prestige in the field of cultural and political debate, antiquity, even the so-called classical antiquity, in the eyes of present-day time perception, is seen as definitively surpassed.
Certainly, the past has a finitude given by time, but not necessarily as a memory of human experience. “Presentism” (A. Krenak, Fr. Hartog), which makes us perceive the distant past as overcome, restricts its role as common memory and material of wisdom for decisions in the present and choices about the future. Certainly, the distant past confronts us with a cultural choice for the incorporation of the very distant, something that neither individual memory nor collective oral memory can fully encompass. The choice to incorporate this heritage is part of an ongoing history and implicitly carries the potential to be a choice for a human and planetary history. Therefore, the history of ancient societies—which goes far beyond in time and space than classical antiquity—needs and can be reconsidered in two ways: in the rescue of its knowledge through the prism of ancestry, its demands, and amplitude, ceasing to be restricted to a tradition in which its status is limited to the affirmation of the present of modernity and thus being open to new research of its diversity.
The concern for the diversity of past societies and the configuration of their memory as ancestry is urgent so that a reflection on the past, aware of the pitfalls of “presentism,” promotes a culture in which it becomes a living, inclusive memory, and for the present and the future to be freed from authoritarian threats of “eternity politics” (Th. Snyder, B. Teitelbaum).

Classical Tradition and Remote Past

Classical studies—understood broadly here as studies dedicated to Greco-Roman civilization and those that took it as a basis—have a prominent place in all the most reputable educational and research institutions worldwide. This fact, besides highlighting its importance for knowledge production since the origin of modern university institutions, also reflects its strategic role in the study of ancient societies. The first factor to explain this is the position of the classical world in the history of written records. Without forgetting the learning of classical societies from the surrounding world, it was they who took a decisive step in the development, conservation, and dissemination of a tradition transformed by their present, which we know through written and archaeological records, in the fields of philosophy, literary production, and history.
Practically contemporaneous, these three written expressions are the basis of classical formation, whether for professionals in history, literature, philology, linguistics, archaeology, or philosophy, or for modern sciences as a whole, derived from such intellectual production. By its nature, classical studies were interdisciplinary avant la lettre, always carried out in the spirit of deep cooperation, interdependence, complexity, and conceptual, theoretical, and methodological density. The study of Greek and Latin literature, for example, dialogues with data and paradigms provided by archaeology, history, anthropology, the study of religions, classical philology, etc.—and vice versa. It is also important to emphasize the importance of so-called “post-classical” studies (Late Antiquity, Middle Ages, modern interpretations and uses of Antiquity, etc.), increasingly recognized as fundamental for understanding earlier periods and Modernity, but also for the critical knowledge of its historical construction, notably in the 19th century.
Indeed, the material quality of testimonies from the classical and post-classical ancient world (nomenclatures that, like all temporal classification, we adopt provisionally and critically) and the preservation of its artifacts have made its study a laboratory of methodologies for approaching other societies of the distant past. Thus, classical and post-classical studies have become the epicenter of the great theoretical and methodological transformations that have had an impact on the humanities since the 18th century. We can cite contributions from authors of various areas and tendencies, such as Edward Gibbon, Friedrich Creuzer, Ulrich von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, Friedrich Nietzsche, Theodor Mommsen, Fustel de Coulanges, Paul Veyne, Marc Bloch, and Georges Duby. Let us also remember the importance of classical formation in the intellectual production of more recent thinkers who were able to present a critical view of modernity full of consequences such as Hannah Arendt, Michel Foucault, Reinhart Koselleck, Paolo Prodi, and Giorgio Agamben.
The study of the classical tradition does not end in itself. It is also the study of its reception, starting with the particular and still very impactful constructions presented by scholars since Late Antiquity itself, reaching the present times. The role of the 19th century in shaping our worldview (including the academic perspective, in shaping modern universities) and, within it, the strategic position given to a certain view of the classical world, recommend that the deconstruction paths of these forms be accompanied by a re-discussion of these ancient foundations.
Among other reflections, the reconstruction that our time is invited to present in the face of the general crisis caused by the empire of merchandise involves the reconsideration of pre-modern societies and, in particular, the tools we seek in classical antiquity to consider them. Abandoning, ignoring, or allowing the weakening of awareness of the role of this distant past consists of a structural danger that jeopardizes the hard-earned legitimacy of humanities studies. It is imperative to remember that such legitimacy of the humanities is an important support for the valorization of facts and rights related to cultures, races, genders, whose recognition is now urgent.
The study of the classical past, its transformation (from which, through the Middle Ages, Modernity and ultimately Post-Modernity emerged), and its reception (which continues to bubble through and despite academics, driving the circuit of problems and objects of study) is a common good that must add to the knowledge related to other foundations of human trajectory on earth.

The Presence of Remote Past

Antiquity—a long pre-modernity encompassing 90% of the time studied by historical research—holds the history of the establishment processes of human societies on the planet. Its connection with the present occurs through the rescue and study of artifacts, cultural memory, its language and literature, but also by the persistence of civilizational options parallel to the Western movement of modernity. Therefore, knowledge of ancient societies is profoundly extensive and complex, involving different models of society, both past and present (E. Góes Neves), many of which still await studies or herald significant transformations in their understanding.

The way knowledge was organized in modernity established a hierarchy among cultural patterns, resulting in gaps and forgetfulness. Challenging this tradition, the Center for Studies on Ancient Diversity: Prehistory, Antiquity, and the Middle Ages aims to study experiences of ancient human societies with the goal of identifying different responses to the demands of social reproduction. From politics to the environment, the crisis of modernity stems from the inadequacy of univocality. Criticizing the foundations of the crisis, however, threatens to lead to extreme reactions that may result in a rejection of the past confused with the very present under examination. In this sense, “presentism” reproduces modern conduct towards the past, attributing to the present an omnipotent capacity in determining the future. The proposal of the Center for Studies on Ancient Diversity: Prehistory, Antiquity, and the Middle Ages, on the contrary, is to rescue the diversity of the past and, overcoming inherited hierarchies, to place experiences in dialogues around issues of common interest. It is hoped that in this way, the past will cease to be lived as tradition—values transmitted with the purpose of establishing and reproducing standards emanating from hierarchically dominant restricted environments—and become ancestry, a living, complex, and inclusive material for collective reflection on the present and the future. From the study of diversity in ancient societies, we aim to compose a panel that challenges imaginations and enriches reflections.

Objectives

General Objectives

  •  Develop research on common problems that foster comparative and multidisciplinary approaches involving Ancient societies with or without writing and their experience with and in diversity.
  • Identify, understand, and add to the memory of cultural studies non-European cultures in their manifestation—as a reference or potential—both outside and within the European experience.
  • Contribute to the knowledge of the diversity and connections of social and socio-environmental experiences.
  • Training of researchers of Ancient societies able to contribute to the deepening and dissemination of the proposal, expanding the interaction between reflection on the distant past and present demands from a planetary perspective.
  • Establishment of agreements and other forms of national and international cooperation aiming at improving discussions and research results.
  • Promotion of the renewal of research on Ancient societies.
  • Strengthen the dissemination of studies on Ancient societies developed at Unicamp.

Specific Objectives

  • Organization of seminars every two months around the research projects of the Center.
  • Organization of biennial international seminars around common issues.
  • Promotion of national and international exchanges.
  • Systematic survey of the situation of graduates in Ancient studies at Unicamp.
  • Systematic survey of the internationalization and institutional insertion of the area.
  • Publication of the results of biennial seminars.
  • Provision of material produced by the Center and reference material for its research.
  • Support for journals of Ancient, Classical, and Post-Classical studies already existing at IFCH and IEL.
  • Offering of interdisciplinary courses and workshops on the topics of interest of the Center.

  • Organization of a hybrid international seminar to launch the Center.
  • Submission of a proposal for the creation of a Certification for the formative course in Classical, Post-Classical, or Ancient studies for students of undergraduate courses at Unicamp represented in the Center.
  • Development of the Center’s media for communication and dissemination (website/database) and extension (social networks).